I've been hearing a lot about the "medical home" model lately and I honestly have not been very clear on what it exactly is. It seems to have started to get more press about the time I hit my "senior slump" and stopped doing medical student rotations with much content other than leaving by noon.
This video provides a good, short introduction to the concept, and
Wikipedia also has a basic article.
Overall, it seems like the model has some potential to make the primary care experience better for patients and physicians alike. It was interesting to learn that the model seems to have originated out of pediatric practices caring for children with chronic illness. The experience I had in medical school that came the closest to the "medical home" model was the month I spent on outpatient pediatric heme-onc. Multiple people saw the patient and his/her at the visit: physician, infusion nurse, and social worker were key. Then others like physical therapists, speech therapists, nutritionists, other specialists were added based on the child's needs. Translators were always available, usually in person. They seemed to do such a good job of addressing everything that some parents said they felt no need to see the general pediatrician for routine visits.
So I wonder if this model could be a good way to go in the future. I have no doubt that the electronic medical record (EMR) can help dramatically in coordinating care. Having spent a good chunk of time this year at a hospital where most clinics still did paper charting, I came to see how frustrating it could be to have no way of finding out anything about a patient in a timely manner. I do not think that EMR is a magic bullet that will save the system; there are many problems with cost, implementation, and coordinating EMR across different health systems that will need to be addressed over time. But it does seem helpful at providing an accessible record for all that care for a patient within one system.
Bringing in nutritionists, PTs, psychologists might be a way to help chronically-ill patients make lifestyle changes, and could help to ease the burden on primary care physicians who do not have enough time to address these issues at routine visits. Group visits and classes could also help to shift to a more preventive focus. Kaiser offers a lot of classes for patients with chronic illness, who are going to undergo routine surgeries, for child-birth and parenting, and even preventive health classes for the "average" person. Feedback I've heard from people have attended these has been mixed, but overall positive. Of course, there is instructor variability to take into account. But Kaiser does seem to have made progress overall in reducing death from heart disease (it's in all of their ads, but if you want to know
more, start on p. 20).
I'm not really sure what the medical home would mean for specialists. Would it make referrals easier? What about for hospital-based physicians? Could it improve care after discharge, which is said to often be a critical time for patients? For those of us in diagnostic specialties it seems it could help with coordinating procedures and getting results to patients in a timely manner. How helpful it is it turn around a biopsy rapidly if the patient, who is anxious and stressed that he/she may have cancer, cannot access anyone to give him/her the results?
I am sure we will hear more about the medical home in the coming months as health care reform takes center stage in Washington. It is clear that we need some drastic changes in our delivery of care in this country. Is this one of the answers? I'd be curious to hear your thoughts.